Batt and Loopop give fair reviews, in my opinion, but you do always see them balancing what they don’t like against things that they do like.Īnybody can sue you for anything in the US, the question is whether the person suing you has a real case or whether they’re just suing you to harass you. It’s not unusual for reviewers like Batt to note that they hate to send the gear back at the end of the review, so even at his level, it’s standard for a well-known reviewer to get early access to the gear, but they still have to send it back.Īt least on Youtube, anytime your content is done in exchange for something, you’re required to select the option “My video contains paid promotion like a product placement, sponsorship, or endorsement.”, adds a label to the video.Ī more valid criticism is just that companies won’t give early access to reviewers that are especially critical. His reach gets him early access to gear, but I haven’t seen any sponsored reviews. Loopop makes clear in his reviews that his work is Patreon supported. Nick does both sponsored and unsponsored videos and it’s obvious which is which, because in sponsored videos, he’ll normally have the manufacturer’s rep in the video doing the presentation, and any hyping is direct from the presenter. People like Nick Batt and Loopop are very clear about what is sponsored.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |